Combustion chamber volumes

If it's broken or just needs tweaked

Moderators: Volker_P, tidd650

pae
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Combustion chamber volumes

Postby pae » Tue May 08, 2007 5:59 am

In response to Pinheads request for some engine details...

A couple of quick measurements over the weekend. Will get more accurate details and set up a page on my website with BIG pictures.

Combustion chambers are ~ 60mm diameter by 17mm deep, and pretty well spherical in shape. At a rough calculation that makes them about 20cc each, but I'll do that accurately later with a pippette.

The old head gasket measures 1.25mm.

I'll check the deck height for your (top of barrel to top of piston at TDC) so you know how much you might have to play with. The pistons are of course crowned so that'll reduce the volume, I'll check on that too.

An original brochure lists compression ratio (UK) at 9.0:1. So with bore/stroke of 59.8 x 55.8mm that gives 156.7cc per pot (627cc overall). If compression is 9:1 then the total combustion volume should be 17.4cc. With a head gasket of 1.25mm thick that's 3.5cc, leaving 13.9cc in the deck and combustion chamber combined.

If you want to get to 10:1 then you'll need to take about 1.73cc out, to reduce it to 15.7cc, or about half a head gasket thickness (~0.6mm).

I think that's correct. As I say, I'll do a proper check later this week.

regards, Phil

Pinhead
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 am

Postby Pinhead » Tue May 08, 2007 11:41 am

Great!! This is jut the info I was looking for!!! The only other thing I need is valve clearance... I'm guessing there is more than a half-mm clearance, so do you think there is enough clearance to shave the head that much (or get a thinner head gasket)?

pae
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Postby pae » Tue May 08, 2007 2:06 pm

Leave it with me. May be the weekend before I can let you know.

regards, Phil

cb650
Posts: 2959
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:20 am
Location: Denver CO USA
Contact:

Postby cb650 » Tue May 08, 2007 5:26 pm

I took off about .o25" (inch) on a couple of mine with no probs. Some day going to make the kid play with one and do some clay to find out the valve clerance.



Terry

Pinhead
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 am

Postby Pinhead » Wed May 09, 2007 12:35 am

Cool! I haven't had my engine torn down, but by looking at the pictures it looks like the intake valve seat will be the biggest limiting factor on shaving the head. The next step would be planing the block (cylinders). That'd probably be a better bet, too, since you'd be able to get different heads if something bad were to happen and keep the same CR without having to shave each one. That would be limited by the compression height, though, since you don't want a ring to come out of the hole at 8000 rpm.

Pinhead
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 am

Postby Pinhead » Wed May 09, 2007 6:01 pm

What if you were to split the difference between the head gasket and the bottom cylinder gasket? 0.3mm on both?

pae
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Postby pae » Thu May 17, 2007 2:29 am

Hmmmm, did a 'fairly accurate' measure of the combustion chamber volumes at the weekend and they are about 26-27cc which is a bit more than I'd expected. Having looked at the pistons though they are quite crowned so I have to assume for the moment there's about 12cc of crown on them to bring the squish volume back down around 14cc (plus gasket at 3.5cc).

Didn't get much chance to do anything else so further details will have to wait, I'm afraid.

regards, Phil

Pinhead
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 am

Postby Pinhead » Thu May 17, 2007 11:40 am

Thanks for taking the time to make these measurements. I know they'll come in handy. I wonder how thin a bottom cylinder gasket we could run...

pae
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Postby pae » Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:02 pm

Hi Pinhead, removed the valves today and took a few more photos for you. Shout if you need anything else...

regards, Phil

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Pinhead
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 am

Postby Pinhead » Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:20 pm

Thanks! Those are the best pictures I've seen to date. Those will really come in handy once I get into the final planning stages of my mods. Thanks again!

pae
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Postby pae » Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:11 am

Glad you like. I've been cleaning it further and de-coking the exhaust ports today so will get some more soon. I'll use my daughters camera too as it gets much better focus on the close shots than I can.

Just seen this. http://www.sohc4.us/forums/index.php?topic=23027.msg237028#msg237028 It's a 750 I think, but the guy doing the work (MRieck) can work wonders and might give you some pointers.

regards, Phil

User avatar
Volker_P
Posts: 5512
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:53 am
Location: southern Germany

Postby Volker_P » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:23 am

Seems you spend much time for internal cleaning also. I would recommend to check also the surfaces for the small O-Rings of the oil lines on both sides of the head. I remember I recogniced some machining traces at the cylinder side but I finally forgot about polishing them away last time. :? I guess this may help to extend the interval for the head oil leak. I'll try to remember next time.

pae
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: East Sussex, UK
Contact:

Postby pae » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:16 am

More (bigger) pics of the ports and chambers...

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

enjoy, let me know if you need more

cb650
Posts: 2959
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 7:20 am
Location: Denver CO USA
Contact:

Postby cb650 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:49 am

I wonder what a extrude hone would cost?




Terry

Pinhead
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 am

Postby Pinhead » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:39 pm

Those intake ports look pretty good, but the exhaust ports look like they could use some work. Definitely much better than the 750's ports!!


Return to “Technical Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests